Client review artifact
This round is about strategic direction, visitor experience, trust, tone, and path clarity. It is not a final copy pass, final image pass, or production build.
Round 1 directions
Each direction includes a homepage, System page, Value Academy page, Embedded Executives page, and application path page so Jill can judge more than a homepage mood.
Direction 1
The most System-led direction. It positions Savvy as one value-creation firm while keeping underled teams, owner dependency, and value leakage in the first screen.
Direction 2
The most direct operator-grade direction. It sells leadership capacity, decision rights, and execution ownership without becoming staffing or role shopping.
Direction 3
The warmest selective direction. It makes Value Academy feel human and rigorous without turning the page into passive courseware or platform sales copy.
What to judge
Can a founder quickly see Value Academy and Embedded Executives as two paths into one system?
Does it feel premium, direct, and serious without becoming generic consulting polish?
Does the application-first posture feel selective and clear instead of like a generic booking funnel?
Do the interior pages prove the concept can carry the full website, not only the homepage?
Feedback prompts
Which direction feels most like Savvy at the next stage of the firm?
Which direction would make a serious owner trust the value-creation system fastest?
Which direction makes the two paths easiest to understand and choose between?
What feels too generic, too soft, too diagram-heavy, too operational, or not like Savvy?
Which interior page best proves that the concept can carry a full website?
What should be borrowed, blended, or removed before the selected direction moves forward?